Welcome to our new web site!
To give our readers a chance to experience all that our new website has to offer, we have made all content freely avaiable, through October 1, 2018.
During this time, print and digital subscribers will not need to log in to view our stories or e-editions.
Dear Howard County Commissioners,
I appreciate the thoughtful consideration the Commission has given to the ongoing discussion regarding a property tax freeze for senior homeowners. As we move …
This item is available in full to subscribers.
We have recently launched a new and improved website. To continue reading, you will need to either log into your subscriber account, or purchase a new subscription.
If you had a login with the previous version of our e-edition, then you already have a login here. You just need to reset your password by clicking here.
If you are a current print subscriber, you can set up a free website account by clicking here.
Otherwise, click here to view your options for subscribing.
Please log in to continue |
|
Dear Howard County Commissioners,
I appreciate the thoughtful consideration the Commission has given to the ongoing discussion regarding a property tax freeze for senior homeowners. As we move forward, I encourage the Commission to take the next step by allowing voters to decide this important issue at the ballot box.
I am the first to admit that I don’t know all the intricacies of our county or city government. However, as a daughter, neighbor, healthcare practitioner, educator, homeowner, and taxpayer, I understand the needs of our community, the importance of efficiency, and the potential challenges of implementing such a program. I also understand the financial burden that fixed incomes—especially for seniors in rural communities—can impose.
Many seniors in our community live on fixed incomes, and rising property taxes can place a significant strain on their finances. A property tax freeze would not exempt seniors from paying taxes but would lock in their rate at the level they became eligible. This means their tax rate will not increase due to rising property values or tax adjustments, providing much-needed financial stability while still allowing them to contribute to local revenues.
This measure would not reduce funding for county services, schools, or small entities. Instead, it would give seniors greater financial certainty, helping them remain in their homes and continue to be active members of the community. As new homeowners and businesses move into the area, the tax base will continue to grow, balancing revenue needs over time.
I understand there are concerns regarding the administrative burden of implementing such a program. However, feedback from other counties indicates that while the initial setup requires additional effort, the renewal process becomes much more manageable. Solutions such as streamlined online applications, integration of real estate and personal property tax assessments, and automated verification systems—similar to those used by Boone County—can help reduce the workload and minimize the need for additional staff. Reaching out to other counties in our class that have initiated the program to fact-find and identify solutions would be helpful.
Moving forward, there are several ways to approach this issue: the Howard County Commission can approve and implement the program, place the measure on an upcoming ballot for voters to decide, or Howard County citizens can initiate a petition. Regardless, it seems the next step is to proceed with a vote in response to the commissioners’ statement, ‘Commissioners said they would not block the measure should voters approve such an ordinance.’ Taking proactive steps ensures that our community has a voice in shaping policies that directly affect its residents.
I believe we can implement this program and maintain fiscal responsibility to our community. Acting will foster an informed public discussion and demonstrate a commitment to supporting our senior residents while maintaining fiscal responsibility for the entire community. I challenge everyone to reflect on this question: Does providing a lifeline to our seniors inhibit growth or undermine county services? I propose that it is possible to provide relief while still functioning effectively. It doesn’t have to be an either/or situation.
Thank you for your time
and consideration.
Sincerely, Dr. Rebbecca Fenton
Comments
No comments on this item Please log in to comment by clicking here