To the Editor:

I appreciate the opportunity to address the allegations made by local activist Paul Lehman in his recent letter regarding my character and conduct and of my decisions in the Courtroom.  While I respect Mr. Lehman‘s right to express his opinions, it is essential to correct several inaccuracies and  misrepresentations in  his statements.

The particular case that Mr. Lehman has referred to is Lehman v Fayette School Board , 20HD-CC00105 wherein he tried to sue over the issue of going to a four day school week.  He unsuccessfully brought the suit alleging that  “Right-wing and conservative politicians” would like to see the public school system fail.  Additionally, his life experiences and research rendered him of the opinion that a four day week was not in the best interests of the Fayette school children.  By filing the lawsuit, he wished to force that opinion upon everyone in the district.

The  problem with his self-represented lawsuit is that he did not have standing to sue.  He was factually and legally incapable of representing the children of Howard County.  He even went as far as unsuccessfully arguing at the appellate court that he had standing to sue because he was a member of the church clergy and was a reporter of abuse.

Inapposite of alleged dictatorships, the Western District Court of Appeals in case # WD84439 reviewed my rulings and judgment  in the case and affirmed the dismissal finding that Mr. Lehman lacked the ability to pursue the lawsuit.  

When an appeal is filed, a verbatim transcript is also prepared and filed.  If anyone has any doubts as to my demeanor towards Mr. Lehman being less than cordial or unprofessional, read the transcript filed in the appellate case. Even though he was representing himself, and not quite well, he was treated with respect and allowed to state his claim. To suggest otherwise is a complete fabrication by a disgruntled party who was told he couldn’t have what he demanded.  Mr Lehman did not understand that the law has to be followed, facts found, and that the Court is not serving the clamor of public opinion. I tried as much to convey that to him.

Constructive criticism is vital for the growth and improvement of any system, including our judicial system. However, misinformation and inflammatory rhetoric serve only to erode public trust and create unnecessary discord.

In closing, I reaffirm my commitment to serving our community with integrity, fairness and respect for the law. I encourage all residents to engage in informed and respectful dialogue, contributing positively to the strength and harmony of our community.

Thank you,

Judge Scott Hayes