Welcome to our new web site!
To give our readers a chance to experience all that our new website has to offer, we have made all content freely avaiable, through October 1, 2018.
During this time, print and digital subscribers will not need to log in to view our stories or e-editions.
To the Editor :
In response to argument over property rights (Fayette Advertiser, July 31). There is no way a quasi government group should be able to tell a property owner what they can or …
This item is available in full to subscribers.
We have recently launched a new and improved website. To continue reading, you will need to either log into your subscriber account, or purchase a new subscription.
If you had a login with the previous version of our e-edition, then you already have a login here. You just need to reset your password by clicking here.
If you are a current print subscriber, you can set up a free website account by clicking here.
Otherwise, click here to view your options for subscribing.
Please log in to continue |
|
To the Editor:
In response to argument over property rights (Fayette Advertiser, July 31). There is no way a quasi government group should be able to tell a property owner what they can or can’t do with their property. Period.
If the rest of the square has buildings that are beyond repair and can look like the west side of the square, please make it happen. Maybe people that want to save useless buildings should buy them. Pam Huttsell evidently believes that the west side of the square looked better before CMU built Eagle Plaza. Does anyone else?
Pat Roll
Comments
No comments on this item Please log in to comment by clicking here