Welcome to our new web site!
To give our readers a chance to experience all that our new website has to offer, we have made all content freely avaiable, through October 1, 2018.
During this time, print and digital subscribers will not need to log in to view our stories or e-editions.
The five candidates for the Glasgow city council who were disqualified from running for those seats because they did not file their financial disclosure statements may still be appointed, according …
This item is available in full to subscribers.
We have recently launched a new and improved website. To continue reading, you will need to either log into your subscriber account, or purchase a new subscription.
If you had a login with the previous version of our e-edition, then you already have a login here. You just need to reset your password by clicking here.
If you are a current print subscriber, you can set up a free website account by clicking here.
Otherwise, click here to view your options for subscribing.
Please log in to continue |
|
The five candidates for the Glasgow city council who were disqualified from running for those seats because they did not file their financial disclosure statements may still be appointed, according to a statement issued last week by the City of Glasgow.
“The State has indicated that the disqualified candidates may not be elected to the seats for which they filed and were disqualified. Therefore, if any qualified candidates receive votes for an open council seat, the qualified candidate with the most votes will be considered by the State to have won the seat,” the city said in the statement.
“In the event that no qualified candidates receive a vote, or the winning candidate refuses the seat, there would be a vacancy that will be filled by appointment from the mayor with the approval of the remaining council members. A disqualified candidate may be appointed to fill a vacancy.”
While the city will be short of a quorum following the election, a mechanism in state law, called the Rule of Necessity, allows for the mayor to appoint aldermen. However, those new aldermen still must receive a majority vote from the remaining council members before they may be sworn in.
“While this situation is certainly not ideal, the City will continue to function and provide essential services to the residents,” the city said.
Comments
No comments on this item Please log in to comment by clicking here